![]() ![]() (1977), RCS reduction of dihedral corners, IEEE T. Moffatt (1965), Transient and impulse response approximations, Proc. Yamada (2006), Polarimetric scattering analysis for a finite dihedral corner reflector, IEICE T. Liu (1989), RCS analysis and reduction for lossy dihedral corner reflectors, Proc. Balanis (1987b), Dihedral corner reflector backscatter using higher order reflections and diffractions, IEEE T. Balanis (1987a), Backscatter analysis of dihedral corner reflectors using physical optics and the physical theory of diffraction, IEEE T. (1975), Far-field approximations to the Kirchoff-Helmholtz representations of scattered fields, IEEE T. Riccio (1998), Physical optics analysis of the field backscattered by a depolarising trihedral corner reflector, IEE P-Microw. Carin (1999), Wide-band VHF scattering from a trihedral reflector situated above a lossy dispersive halfspace, IEEE T. Guo (2010), Landslide monitoring by corner reflectors differential interferometry SAR, Int. Rocca (2001), Permanent scatterers in SAR interferometry, IEEE T. Romeu (2011), Transpolarizing trihedral corner reflector characterization using a GB-SAR system, IEEE Geosci. Wang (2006), Analysis of RCS characteristic of dihedral corner reflectors, Ship Electronic Eng. Wang (2007), New hybridization of PO, SBR, and MoM for scattering by large complex conducting objects, J. Castillo (2002), Subsidence monitoring using SAR interferometry: Reduction of the atmospheric effects using stochastic filtering, Geophys. Gennarelli (1987), Backscattering by loaded and unloaded dihedral corners, IEEE T. Li (2000), Monitoring earth surface deformations with InSAR technology: principle and some critical issues, J. Tang (2007), RCS analysis of hypersonic cruise vehicle, J. ![]() Vasudevan (2006), Radar cross-section enhancement of dihedral corner reflector using fractal-based metallo-dielectric structures, Electron. Yu (1991), High frequency scattering from trihedral corner reflectors and other benchmark targets: SBR versus experiment, IEEE T. (1989), Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics, John Wiley & Sons, New York.īaldauf, J., S.-W. (1987), Consequences of nonorthogonality on the scattering properties of dihedral reflectors, IEEE T. Due to the high cost of deploying ACRs in the fields, the physical optics method seems to provide a viable way to choose appropriate ACRs.Īnderson, W.C. Its RCS values, however, are the least of the three. The triangular pyramidal trihedral ACR is the most geometrically stable ACR, and has the highest tolerance towards incident radar ray’s deviation. Our calculation suggests that the square trihedral ACR produces the largest RCS but least tolerance towards incident radar ray’s deviation from optimal angle. Based on physical optics methods, via calculating the radar cross section (RCS) values (the higher the value, the better the detectability), the current study tested three ACRs, i.e., triangular pyramidal, rectangular pyramidal and square trihedral ACRs. The choice of the most appropriate ones has recently attracted scholarly attentions. Artificial corner reflectors (ACRs) are widely applicable in monitoring terrain change via interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) remote sensing techniques.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |